THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF CASE LAW

The Basic Principles Of what is the purpose of case law

The Basic Principles Of what is the purpose of case law

Blog Article

III)     While in the Edition of the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second version) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed to the petitioner and others was simple existence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.

Delay in recording confessional statement is probably not treated fatal to your case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may possibly search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Ordinarily, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (including These in distinct violation of set up case legislation) towards the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, plus the case is just not appealed, the decision will stand.

record of the department there is not any record accessible whatsoever regarding promotion with the petitioner(Promotion)

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.

Free case regulation sites in Pakistan are priceless resources for anyone needing to understand Pakistani legislation. By utilizing the guidelines and techniques outlined in this article, you are able to navigate these resources effectively and conduct thorough legal research.

six.  Mere involvement inside a heinous offence is not any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for that concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, because then He's driving the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more demanded for further investigation, therefore, his continual incarceration would not serve any valuable purpose at this stage.

This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners could search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only done if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded on the allegations therefore they were very well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to some person, by undertaking an act which during the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently harmful that it must in all likelihood cause death, causes the death with the this kind of person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

A reduce court might not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it's unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. In the event the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the law evolve, it may well both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow for just a judge to recommend that an memorandum of association case law appeal be performed.

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to observe that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case regulation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held through the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--

Report this page